The party will increase apprenticeships and introduce new Lifelong Skills Grants to support workforce development.

This new clause to the employer pension contributions bill was rejected, but its specific content is not provided. Without knowing what change New Clause 5 would have made to pension contribution treatment, it is impossible to assess whether voting Aye would affect the apprenticeship promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved the employer pension contributions bill, which reduces National Insurance on pension contributions. While pensions relate to worker benefits, this division does not directly address apprenticeships or Lifelong Skills Grants. The connection to the manifesto promise is too indirect.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This bill changes National Insurance treatment of employer pension contributions, intended to encourage workplace pensions. While pensions relate broadly to worker benefits, this division does not directly address apprenticeships or Lifelong Skills Grants. The connection to the manifesto promise is too indirect.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, which devolves powers including potentially skills training to local areas. While devolution could affect how apprenticeships are delivered, the division concerns the general principle of devolution rather than a specific commitment to expand apprenticeships or introduce Lifelong Skills Grants.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This reasoned amendment opposed the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill. While devolution could affect how apprenticeships are delivered locally, the division concerns the general principle of devolution rather than apprenticeship policy specifically. The connection is too indirect to establish a clear relationship to the apprenticeship promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote rejected a new clause to the apprenticeship governance bill, but the specific content of New Clause 4 is not provided. Without knowing what the clause would have required regarding the transfer of functions, it is impossible to determine whether voting Aye would advance or contradict the apprenticeship promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote rejected a new clause to the apprenticeship governance bill, but the specific content of the clause is not provided. Without knowing what the clause would have required, it is impossible to assess whether voting Aye would advance or undermine the apprenticeship promise. The division concerns institutional mechanics rather than substantive apprenticeship policy.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote rejected an amendment to the apprenticeship governance bill, but the specific content of Amendment 6 is not provided. Without knowing what change it would have made to the transfer of functions, it is impossible to assess whether voting Aye would support or undermine the apprenticeship promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved the final passage of the apprenticeship governance restructuring bill. While the bill reorganises how apprenticeships are administered, the division itself does not directly commit to increasing apprenticeships or introducing Lifelong Skills Grants—the core promises. Voting Aye supports the institutional framework but does not directly advance the substantive commitment to expand apprenticeships.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. While infrastructure development could indirectly support economic conditions for apprenticeships, the division concerns planning reform rather than apprenticeship policy specifically. The connection is too tenuous.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

The reasoned amendment opposed the bill's core principle of transferring apprenticeship functions. Voting Aye would have rejected the restructuring. The manifesto commits to investing in apprenticeships, and opposing a reorganisation of apprenticeship governance could be seen as protecting the existing institutional framework. However, the bill's actual effect on apprenticeship delivery is unclear, making this a medium-confidence judgment that the amendment's defeat allows the government to proceed with its restructuring plans.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved transferring apprenticeship functions from an independent institute to the Department for Education. While this affects apprenticeship governance, the division does not directly commit to increasing apprenticeships or introducing Lifelong Skills Grants. Voting Aye supports centralising apprenticeship policy but does not directly advance the substantive expansion promised.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This amendment to the National Insurance bill was defeated. Voting Aye would have modified the employer tax increase. The manifesto promises apprenticeship investment, which the government argues the National Insurance revenue will support. Voting Aye to change the tax mechanism could reduce funding available for apprenticeships, though the specific effect of Amendment 23 is unclear.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This amendment to the National Insurance bill was defeated, allowing the employer tax increase to proceed. Voting Aye would have modified the tax increase. The manifesto promises apprenticeship investment funded by this revenue. Voting Aye to block or modify the funding mechanism would undermine the government's ability to deliver on the apprenticeship promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This new clause would have required an impact assessment of the National Insurance increase on employment and sectors. While employment effects are relevant to apprenticeship expansion, the clause concerns procedural scrutiny rather than the substance of apprenticeship policy. Voting Aye would support transparency but does not directly advance or undermine the apprenticeship promise itself.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved the National Insurance increase bill at third reading. The government argues this revenue funds public services including skills and apprenticeship investment. Voting Aye supports the funding mechanism the government claims will enable apprenticeship expansion, though the connection is indirect and depends on how the revenue is allocated.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This amendment to the National Insurance bill was defeated. Voting Aye would have modified the employer tax increase. The manifesto promises apprenticeship investment funded by this revenue. Voting Aye to change the tax mechanism could reduce funding available for apprenticeships, though the specific effect of Amendment 13 is unclear.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

The manifesto promises to invest in apprenticeships and skills development. Voting Aye on this opposition motion would reject the government's National Insurance increase, which the government argues is necessary to fund public services including skills investment. However, the opposition argues the increase harms businesses and could reduce hiring—directly undermining the ability to expand apprenticeships. The division presents a trade-off: rejecting the funding mechanism could undermine the government's capacity to deliver on the apprenticeship promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

This vote approved the National Insurance bill at second reading. The government argues the revenue from the employer tax increase will fund public services including apprenticeship and skills investment. Voting Aye supports the funding mechanism the government claims will enable the apprenticeship promise, though the connection depends on actual allocation of revenue.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś

The reasoned amendment opposed the National Insurance increase bill. Voting Aye would have rejected the employer tax rise. The manifesto promises to invest in apprenticeships, which the government argues the National Insurance revenue will help fund. Rejecting the funding mechanism would undermine the government's capacity to deliver on apprenticeship investment, making this division contradictory to the promise.

Reviewed by Tomasz Mikuś